+212.5%
BMNR vs AMT
-14.6%
+227.1%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AMT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -0.2% | -2.1% | -2.0% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +1.5% | +3.5% | +3.3% |
| 30D | +33.8% | +3.7% | +30.0% | +27.1% |
| 3M | +49.4% | -7.2% | +56.6% | +67.0% |
| 6M | +17.0% | -4.2% | +21.1% | +20.3% |
| YTD | -10.8% | +1.9% | -12.7% | -35.9% |
| 1Y | -45.7% | -6.4% | -39.3% | -45.6% |
| All | +212.5% | -14.6% | +227.1% | -89.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling