+63.2%
BLK vs LCID
-93.0%
+156.2%
-23.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -2.1% | +1.2% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -5.2% | -9.1% | +4.0% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -7.0% | -37.6% | +30.6% | -3.1% |
| 3M | +5.7% | -11.1% | +16.7% | +5.0% |
| 6M | +11.0% | -59.2% | +70.2% | +18.2% |
| YTD | +0.9% | -60.5% | +61.3% | +7.3% |
| 1Y | -1.6% | -78.5% | +76.9% | +10.0% |
| All | +63.2% | -93.0% | +156.2% | +97.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling