+160.1%
BLFS vs VOO
+77.8%
+82.4%
-37.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -0.4% | -0.4% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -3.1% | +0.1% | -3.2% | -3.3% |
| 30D | +4.3% | +0.1% | +4.2% | +4.2% |
| 3M | +30.1% | +2.0% | +28.1% | +26.0% |
| 6M | +70.5% | +13.0% | +57.5% | +41.1% |
| YTD | +45.8% | +13.6% | +32.2% | +19.7% |
| 1Y | +36.3% | +20.1% | +16.2% | +2.5% |
| All | +160.1% | +77.8% | +82.4% | -13.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling