+12.8%
BLDR vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+112.8%
-72.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | -7.1% | +9.4% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -8.2% | -5.4% | -2.8% | -8.2% |
| 30D | -16.6% | -24.8% | +8.2% | -16.5% |
| 3M | -23.2% | -62.8% | +39.6% | -23.5% |
| 6M | -33.7% | -99.5% | +65.8% | -30.2% |
| YTD | -41.3% | -99.8% | +58.4% | -37.6% |
| 1Y | -58.8% | -99.9% | +41.1% | -55.8% |
| 3Y | -57.5% | -100.0% | +42.5% | -55.9% |
| All | +12.8% | -100.0% | +112.8% | +18.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling