-55.3%
BLDR vs RGEN
-0.1%
-55.2%
-70.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | +0.6% | -5.4% | -5.1% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -0.9% | +0.5% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -16.2% | +2.8% | -19.0% | -17.1% |
| 3M | -14.4% | +34.5% | -48.9% | -22.9% |
| 6M | -32.8% | +40.5% | -73.2% | -40.8% |
| YTD | -39.2% | +2.8% | -42.0% | -40.7% |
| 1Y | -57.7% | +39.6% | -97.3% | -62.8% |
| 3Y | -55.3% | +4.4% | -59.7% | -55.5% |
| All | -55.3% | -0.1% | -55.2% | -55.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling