-56.2%
BLDR vs PFGC
-8.0%
-48.2%
-58.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -1.2% | -0.7% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -3.7% | +1.0% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -14.7% | -16.0% | +1.2% | -6.5% |
| 3M | -20.8% | -4.1% | -16.7% | -19.5% |
| 6M | -35.3% | +8.7% | -44.1% | -38.7% |
| YTD | -40.3% | +6.4% | -46.7% | -44.6% |
| All | -56.2% | -8.0% | -48.2% | -57.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling