-2.9%
BLDR vs FGI
-70.4%
+67.5%
-70.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FGI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.5% | +7.5% | -5.0% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -2.8% | +0.5% | -3.4% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -13.3% | +65.4% | -78.7% | -14.5% |
| 3M | -12.3% | +23.5% | -35.8% | -13.2% |
| 6M | -31.5% | +60.5% | -92.0% | -32.9% |
| YTD | -36.1% | +30.0% | -66.1% | -37.2% |
| 1Y | -54.1% | +82.1% | -136.1% | -55.2% |
| 3Y | -55.8% | -4.4% | -51.4% | -56.3% |
| All | -2.9% | -70.4% | +67.5% | -2.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FGI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FGI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FGI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FGI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling