-20.2%
BKNG vs UMC
+231.0%
-251.2%
-30.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -2.5% | +3.0% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -10.7% | +11.4% | -22.0% | -10.7% |
| 30D | -18.1% | +16.8% | -34.9% | -18.3% |
| 3M | +8.5% | +19.1% | -10.6% | +6.2% |
| 6M | -0.1% | +137.4% | -137.5% | -8.4% |
| YTD | -18.2% | +186.4% | -204.6% | -26.4% |
| All | -20.2% | +231.0% | -251.2% | -29.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling