+39.1%
BKNG vs NIO
-64.4%
+103.5%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.8% | -2.4% | -1.4% | -3.7% |
| 7D | -13.1% | -4.1% | -9.0% | -13.0% |
| 30D | -18.5% | -23.2% | +4.7% | -17.7% |
| 3M | +5.8% | -29.9% | +35.7% | +7.1% |
| 6M | -2.1% | -25.1% | +23.0% | -1.5% |
| YTD | -18.6% | -27.5% | +8.8% | -18.1% |
| 1Y | -21.7% | -41.1% | +19.4% | -20.5% |
| All | +39.1% | -64.4% | +103.5% | +46.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling