+39.8%
BKNG vs EAT
+585.9%
-546.1%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -0.3% | +0.8% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -10.7% | -6.2% | -4.5% | -9.6% |
| 30D | -18.1% | -3.0% | -15.1% | -17.8% |
| 3M | +8.5% | +45.6% | -37.1% | +0.9% |
| 6M | -0.1% | +53.5% | -53.6% | -8.5% |
| YTD | -18.2% | +49.6% | -67.8% | -25.0% |
| 1Y | -19.9% | +38.9% | -58.8% | -25.7% |
| All | +39.8% | +585.9% | -546.1% | +2.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling