-99.8%
BIYA vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+0.1%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -1.7% | +2.6% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -2.0% | +0.7% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -15.9% | -19.8% | +3.9% | -16.4% |
| 3M | -81.2% | -62.1% | -19.2% | -78.7% |
| 6M | -88.2% | -99.5% | +11.3% | -82.2% |
| YTD | -94.1% | -99.7% | +5.6% | -90.9% |
| 1Y | -98.7% | -99.9% | +1.2% | -98.0% |
| All | -99.8% | -99.9% | +0.1% | -99.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling