-98.2%
BIYA vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+1.7%
-99.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -3.0% | -0.2% | -3.3% |
| 7D | -4.0% | -13.3% | +9.3% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -15.0% | -49.6% | +34.6% | -16.3% |
| 3M | -58.1% | -54.6% | -3.5% | -58.8% |
| 6M | -90.0% | -99.8% | +9.8% | -79.3% |
| YTD | -96.9% | -99.9% | +2.9% | -93.0% |
| 1Y | -98.2% | -99.9% | +1.7% | -94.5% |
| All | -98.2% | -99.9% | +1.7% | -94.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling