-99.9%
BIYA vs XPO
+81.9%
-181.8%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | XPO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +2.2% | -2.2% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +9.0% | +9.0% | 0.0% | +9.2% |
| 30D | -12.9% | +4.2% | -17.1% | -12.9% |
| 3M | -54.7% | -8.7% | -46.0% | -54.6% |
| 6M | -85.1% | -2.8% | -82.3% | -85.3% |
| YTD | -96.9% | +41.9% | -138.7% | -97.2% |
| 1Y | -98.5% | +42.3% | -140.9% | -98.7% |
| All | -99.9% | +81.9% | -181.8% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XPO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XPO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XPO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XPO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling