-99.9%
BIYA vs REPL
+93.4%
-193.3%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | REPL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.4% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +9.0% | +1.2% | +7.8% | +9.1% |
| 30D | -12.9% | +92.2% | -105.1% | -7.9% |
| 3M | -54.7% | +44.1% | -98.8% | -53.1% |
| 6M | -85.1% | +313.0% | -398.1% | -82.4% |
| YTD | -96.9% | +125.2% | -222.1% | -96.2% |
| 1Y | -98.5% | +143.8% | -242.3% | -98.2% |
| All | -99.9% | +93.4% | -193.3% | -99.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside REPL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus REPL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × REPL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded REPL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling