-99.8%
BIYA vs PTEN
+60.7%
-160.4%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PTEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -1.0% | -0.7% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +1.3% | +0.7% | +0.6% | +1.0% |
| 30D | -21.0% | +31.2% | -52.2% | -27.0% |
| 3M | -74.3% | +2.0% | -76.3% | -73.3% |
| 6M | -84.6% | +42.4% | -127.0% | -85.7% |
| YTD | -94.2% | +109.2% | -203.4% | -95.3% |
| 1Y | -98.2% | +122.3% | -220.5% | -98.6% |
| All | -99.8% | +60.7% | -160.4% | -99.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PTEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PTEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PTEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PTEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling