-99.8%
BIYA vs KRMN
+12.8%
-112.6%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.7% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -3.4% | +6.1% | +2.6% |
| 30D | -18.7% | -31.8% | +13.1% | -20.1% |
| 3M | -72.0% | -20.0% | -52.0% | -72.2% |
| 6M | -86.4% | -60.5% | -25.9% | -87.7% |
| YTD | -94.2% | -45.8% | -48.4% | -94.5% |
| 1Y | -98.4% | -36.4% | -62.1% | -98.6% |
| All | -99.8% | +12.8% | -112.6% | -99.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling