-99.9%
BIYA vs FGI
+78.3%
-178.2%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FGI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.9% | -0.1% | +5.0% | +4.9% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -4.1% | 0.0% | -4.0% |
| 30D | -35.5% | -3.4% | -32.2% | -35.5% |
| 3M | -56.3% | +61.8% | -118.1% | -56.6% |
| 6M | -88.7% | +17.0% | -105.7% | -88.6% |
| YTD | -97.0% | +31.4% | -128.4% | -97.0% |
| 1Y | -98.7% | +42.7% | -141.4% | -98.7% |
| All | -99.9% | +78.3% | -178.2% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FGI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FGI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FGI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FGI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling