-99.9%
BIYA vs DAR
+72.2%
-172.1%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DAR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.9% | -1.8% | +6.7% | +5.0% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -3.8% | -0.2% | -3.9% |
| 30D | -35.5% | -14.4% | -21.1% | -35.2% |
| 3M | -56.3% | -17.9% | -38.4% | -56.0% |
| 6M | -88.7% | -18.3% | -70.4% | -88.8% |
| YTD | -97.0% | +43.2% | -140.2% | -97.1% |
| 1Y | -98.7% | +57.7% | -156.4% | -98.8% |
| All | -99.9% | +72.2% | -172.1% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DAR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DAR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DAR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DAR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling