-99.8%
BIYA vs BBIO
+117.0%
-216.7%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -0.1% | -2.1% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -1.8% | -3.2% | +1.4% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -17.5% | -13.6% | -3.9% | -18.6% |
| 3M | -78.0% | +7.2% | -85.3% | -77.3% |
| 6M | -89.5% | +1.5% | -90.9% | -89.3% |
| YTD | -94.3% | -5.3% | -89.0% | -94.2% |
| 1Y | -98.6% | +37.7% | -136.3% | -98.5% |
| All | -99.8% | +117.0% | -216.7% | -99.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling