-17.1%
BIIB vs PENG
+101.4%
-118.5%
-57.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +6.4% | -8.1% | -1.9% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +4.5% | -3.5% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +6.9% | -7.1% | +14.0% | +7.0% |
| 3M | +12.4% | -27.3% | +39.7% | +13.0% |
| 6M | +16.3% | +169.6% | -153.3% | +6.1% |
| YTD | +25.5% | +164.6% | -139.1% | +14.3% |
| 1Y | +57.8% | +109.5% | -51.7% | +45.7% |
| All | -17.1% | +101.4% | -118.5% | -26.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling