+29.3%
BHP vs UMAC
+31.5%
-2.1%
-15.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -6.4% | +6.7% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +0.9% | +3.3% | -2.4% | +0.6% |
| 30D | +4.0% | -10.4% | +14.4% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +11.3% | +1.8% | +9.5% | +9.0% |
| 6M | +29.3% | +40.7% | -11.4% | +22.5% |
| All | +29.3% | +31.5% | -2.1% | +22.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling