+58.5%
BEN vs LDOS
+35.4%
+23.1%
-40.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | +0.1% | -5.0% | -4.9% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -3.7% | +3.3% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -0.7% | +16.4% | -17.1% | -3.4% |
| 3M | -6.8% | +7.4% | -14.2% | -8.3% |
| 6M | +7.9% | -0.3% | +8.2% | +7.5% |
| YTD | +39.6% | -24.0% | +63.6% | +46.3% |
| 1Y | +48.5% | -29.6% | +78.1% | +58.2% |
| All | +58.5% | +35.4% | +23.1% | +41.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling