+1,874.3%
BE vs LPLA
+33.3%
+1,841.0%
-52.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +13.0% | -2.2% | +15.2% | +13.7% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -3.2% | +7.7% | +5.7% |
| 30D | -20.1% | -8.6% | -11.5% | -18.2% |
| 3M | -0.8% | -18.7% | +17.9% | +5.6% |
| 6M | -26.2% | +4.5% | -30.8% | -29.4% |
| YTD | +141.1% | -15.3% | +156.4% | +150.3% |
| 1Y | +64.8% | -19.9% | +84.7% | +75.5% |
| All | +1,874.3% | +33.3% | +1,841.0% | +2,038.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling