+989.8%
BE vs KRMN
+17.4%
+972.4%
-52.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.9% | -11.3% | +8.4% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +23.9% | -12.9% | +36.8% | +32.4% |
| 30D | +27.8% | -43.3% | +71.2% | +69.9% |
| 3M | +3.7% | -27.2% | +30.9% | +18.4% |
| 6M | +78.0% | -66.8% | +144.8% | +206.9% |
| YTD | +209.9% | -51.9% | +261.8% | +328.8% |
| 1Y | +389.6% | -43.7% | +433.3% | +541.4% |
| All | +989.8% | +17.4% | +972.4% | +889.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling