+1,611.9%
BE vs CLSK
+191.6%
+1,420.3%
-52.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.0% | -3.6% | -0.4% | -2.9% |
| 7D | +9.7% | +1.7% | +8.0% | +9.3% |
| 30D | +22.4% | +11.1% | +11.3% | +18.3% |
| 3M | +10.4% | -14.1% | +24.5% | +15.1% |
| 6M | +67.9% | +32.9% | +34.9% | +53.2% |
| YTD | +197.5% | +26.5% | +171.0% | +174.5% |
| 1Y | +310.6% | +27.6% | +282.9% | +276.9% |
| All | +1,611.9% | +191.6% | +1,420.3% | +845.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling