+1,580.2%
BE vs CLS
+1,245.2%
+335.0%
-52.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.4% | +0.8% | +6.5% | +6.9% |
| 7D | +20.0% | +4.6% | +15.4% | +16.5% |
| 30D | +7.9% | -13.9% | +21.8% | +17.1% |
| 3M | -13.2% | -26.6% | +13.4% | +3.5% |
| 6M | +53.5% | +15.4% | +38.0% | +41.4% |
| YTD | +191.0% | +5.7% | +185.4% | +179.9% |
| 1Y | +360.5% | +41.1% | +319.4% | +297.7% |
| All | +1,580.2% | +1,245.2% | +335.0% | +366.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling