+44.1%
BBY vs HTZ
-85.8%
+129.9%
-44.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.2% | +1.3% | +1.9% | +3.1% |
| 7D | +9.5% | +7.5% | +2.0% | +8.9% |
| 30D | +6.8% | +47.4% | -40.6% | +2.9% |
| 3M | +28.9% | -54.9% | +83.8% | +34.7% |
| 6M | +37.8% | -47.0% | +84.8% | +41.3% |
| YTD | +38.7% | -55.3% | +94.0% | +44.2% |
| 1Y | +23.7% | -57.6% | +81.3% | +27.9% |
| All | +44.1% | -85.8% | +129.9% | +79.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling