+44.1%
BBY vs EPAM
-54.6%
+98.7%
-44.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.2% | -2.4% | +5.5% | +3.7% |
| 7D | +9.5% | +2.0% | +7.5% | +8.9% |
| 30D | +6.8% | +6.5% | +0.3% | +4.8% |
| 3M | +28.9% | +19.9% | +8.9% | +22.4% |
| 6M | +37.8% | -16.9% | +54.7% | +42.9% |
| YTD | +38.7% | -42.9% | +81.6% | +56.5% |
| 1Y | +23.7% | -30.4% | +54.1% | +31.4% |
| All | +44.1% | -54.6% | +98.7% | +60.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling