-56.8%
BBWI vs UMAC
+488.3%
-545.0%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -3.2% | +1.8% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -8.0% | -4.0% | -4.0% | -7.9% |
| 30D | -6.6% | -9.4% | +2.8% | -6.4% |
| 3M | -2.7% | +3.0% | -5.7% | -3.6% |
| 6M | -12.8% | +27.2% | -40.0% | -15.5% |
| YTD | -10.5% | +84.7% | -95.2% | -15.3% |
| 1Y | -35.3% | +136.5% | -171.8% | -40.2% |
| All | -56.8% | +488.3% | -545.0% | -66.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling