-100.0%
BBLG vs SPY
+87.9%
-187.9%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | SPY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -0.5% | -0.9% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +0.5% | -1.1% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -40.0% | -0.9% | -39.0% | -39.6% |
| 3M | -55.2% | +3.9% | -59.1% | -56.4% |
| 6M | -56.2% | +14.5% | -70.8% | -60.3% |
| YTD | -61.4% | +12.9% | -74.3% | -64.6% |
| 1Y | -74.0% | +19.4% | -93.3% | -76.9% |
| 3Y | -98.3% | +78.5% | -176.8% | -98.9% |
| All | -100.0% | +87.9% | -187.9% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SPY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SPY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SPY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SPY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling