+97.9%
BAC vs ZETA
+348.6%
-250.7%
-27.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | -1.7% | +2.7% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +3.2% | +18.1% | -14.9% | +1.5% |
| 30D | -0.7% | +13.6% | -14.3% | -2.1% |
| 3M | -20.0% | +23.7% | -43.7% | -21.8% |
| 6M | +3.4% | +128.5% | -125.1% | -5.5% |
| YTD | -5.7% | +80.1% | -85.8% | -12.5% |
| 1Y | -1.4% | +98.0% | -99.4% | -9.4% |
| 3Y | +97.9% | +348.6% | -250.7% | +54.5% |
| All | +97.9% | +348.6% | -250.7% | +54.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling