-40.4%
BABA vs XLC
-2.4%
-38.0%
-46.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +1.1% | -1.0% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -13.8% | +3.7% | -17.5% | -15.9% |
| 30D | -15.1% | -1.9% | -13.2% | -14.0% |
| 3M | -22.7% | -3.1% | -19.6% | -21.2% |
| 6M | -34.7% | -6.4% | -28.3% | -31.1% |
| YTD | -35.0% | -6.8% | -28.2% | -32.9% |
| 1Y | -40.4% | -1.7% | -38.7% | -41.1% |
| All | -40.4% | -2.4% | -38.0% | -41.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling