-21.9%
BABA vs GFS
-48.7%
+26.7%
-34.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +6.2% | -4.9% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +11.6% | -7.8% | +19.5% | +11.7% |
| 30D | +2.3% | -19.7% | +21.9% | +2.9% |
| 3M | -13.7% | -23.1% | +9.4% | -13.4% |
| 6M | -21.9% | -46.4% | +24.5% | -20.1% |
| All | -21.9% | -48.7% | +26.7% | -20.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling