-21.9%
BABA vs CTAS
+32.0%
-53.9%
-34.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | CTAS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -1.8% | +3.1% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +11.6% | +1.2% | +10.5% | +11.6% |
| 30D | +2.3% | +12.8% | -10.5% | +1.8% |
| 3M | -13.7% | +10.3% | -24.0% | -14.1% |
| 6M | -21.9% | +32.0% | -53.9% | -20.1% |
| All | -21.9% | +32.0% | -53.9% | -20.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CTAS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CTAS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CTAS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CTAS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling