+198.7%
B vs LNT
+50.4%
+148.3%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | +0.9% | -2.4% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +2.3% | +1.0% | +1.3% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +1.4% | -1.1% | +2.4% | +1.8% |
| 3M | +12.2% | -3.6% | +15.8% | +13.4% |
| 6M | -2.1% | -2.7% | +0.5% | -1.7% |
| YTD | +2.9% | +8.0% | -5.1% | -1.4% |
| 1Y | +55.3% | +10.5% | +44.9% | +46.9% |
| 3Y | +198.7% | +49.6% | +149.1% | +130.2% |
| All | +198.7% | +50.4% | +148.3% | +130.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling