-100.0%
AZTR vs VOO
+78.0%
-178.0%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -0.6% | +1.7% | +1.5% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -2.0% | +2.0% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +25.9% | -1.7% | +27.5% | +27.4% |
| 3M | -24.4% | +4.7% | -29.1% | -27.0% |
| 6M | -12.2% | +12.6% | -24.7% | -20.4% |
| YTD | -32.1% | +11.8% | -43.8% | -37.9% |
| 1Y | -76.7% | +17.5% | -94.2% | -79.5% |
| 3Y | -100.0% | +77.0% | -176.9% | -100.0% |
| All | -100.0% | +78.0% | -178.0% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling