-2.2%
AZO vs VIK
+221.3%
-223.5%
-33.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VIK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -1.2% | +0.2% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -1.8% | -1.1% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -5.3% | -17.3% | +12.0% | -4.1% |
| 3M | -7.3% | -5.1% | -2.3% | -7.2% |
| 6M | -22.7% | +16.2% | -38.9% | -23.9% |
| YTD | -15.0% | +17.6% | -32.7% | -16.7% |
| 1Y | -32.2% | +33.5% | -65.8% | -34.3% |
| All | -2.2% | +221.3% | -223.5% | -16.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VIK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VIK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VIK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VIK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling