+11.8%
AZO vs PFGC
+58.8%
-47.0%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.4% | +0.3% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -3.6% | -4.8% | +1.2% | -2.6% |
| 30D | -5.6% | -12.5% | +7.0% | -2.9% |
| 3M | -6.6% | -9.7% | +3.1% | -4.6% |
| 6M | -22.5% | +7.0% | -29.5% | -23.6% |
| YTD | -15.2% | +4.5% | -19.6% | -16.3% |
| 1Y | -33.9% | -11.6% | -22.4% | -32.8% |
| 3Y | +11.8% | +58.5% | -46.7% | +1.1% |
| All | +11.8% | +58.8% | -47.0% | +1.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling