+13.1%
AZO vs M
+106.8%
-93.6%
-33.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | M | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -4.2% | +2.8% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -4.1% | +3.3% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -5.1% | -13.6% | +8.5% | -4.8% |
| 3M | -7.2% | -2.3% | -4.9% | -7.2% |
| 6M | -20.7% | +21.9% | -42.6% | -21.2% |
| YTD | -14.2% | -0.6% | -13.6% | -14.4% |
| 1Y | -32.2% | +29.7% | -61.9% | -32.8% |
| All | +13.1% | +106.8% | -93.6% | +8.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside M.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus M return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × M return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded M wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling