-14.7%
AZO vs LSCC
+72.6%
-87.3%
-29.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -5.5% | +5.7% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +1.3% | +7.0% | -5.6% | +1.7% |
| 30D | +12.0% | -2.3% | +14.3% | +12.3% |
| 3M | +7.2% | -12.5% | +19.7% | +7.3% |
| 6M | -3.2% | -10.6% | +7.4% | -4.5% |
| YTD | -3.9% | +52.7% | -56.6% | -7.7% |
| 1Y | -14.7% | +74.0% | -88.6% | -17.3% |
| All | -14.7% | +72.6% | -87.3% | -17.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling