-29.5%
AZO vs LSCC
+72.9%
-102.4%
-32.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | +2.0% | -1.5% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +0.7% | +1.3% | -0.6% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -2.7% | -9.7% | +7.0% | -3.1% |
| 3M | -3.2% | -23.7% | +20.5% | -3.4% |
| 6M | -19.7% | +26.5% | -46.2% | -21.3% |
| YTD | -12.0% | +57.5% | -69.6% | -10.8% |
| 1Y | -29.5% | +75.7% | -105.2% | -26.2% |
| All | -29.5% | +72.9% | -102.4% | -26.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling