+23.4%
AZO vs LDOS
+32.3%
-8.8%
-35.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | -2.3% | -0.5% | -2.5% |
| 7D | +1.5% | -7.2% | +8.7% | +2.4% |
| 30D | +13.0% | +16.8% | -3.8% | +11.1% |
| 3M | +4.8% | -1.6% | +6.4% | +4.8% |
| 6M | -9.2% | -1.0% | -8.2% | -9.4% |
| YTD | -5.2% | -25.8% | +20.6% | -3.0% |
| 1Y | -12.4% | -31.1% | +18.6% | -9.6% |
| 3Y | +23.4% | +32.8% | -9.4% | +7.2% |
| All | +23.4% | +32.3% | -8.8% | +7.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling