+70.5%
AZO vs EPAM
-75.7%
+146.2%
-35.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -0.4% | +0.6% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +1.3% | +2.4% | -1.1% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +12.0% | +42.3% | -30.4% | +9.0% |
| 3M | +7.2% | +60.7% | -53.4% | +3.4% |
| 6M | -3.2% | +80.5% | -83.7% | -7.6% |
| YTD | -3.9% | -20.4% | +16.5% | -3.8% |
| 1Y | -14.7% | -9.6% | -5.1% | -15.3% |
| 3Y | +20.4% | -30.5% | +50.9% | +20.0% |
| All | +70.5% | -75.7% | +146.2% | +78.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling