+44.9%
AZN vs GTLB
-50.8%
+95.8%
-27.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -1.7% | -0.2% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -6.6% | +3.7% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -3.1% | +13.7% | -16.8% | -3.5% |
| 3M | -14.4% | +52.9% | -67.3% | -15.7% |
| 6M | -19.5% | +88.5% | -108.0% | -21.4% |
| YTD | -13.8% | +23.4% | -37.2% | -14.5% |
| 1Y | -2.4% | -3.8% | +1.4% | -2.5% |
| 3Y | +21.3% | -11.5% | +32.8% | +19.9% |
| All | +44.9% | -50.8% | +95.8% | +36.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling