+3,165.9%
AXTI vs MSTZ
-99.2%
+3,265.0%
-73.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +5.5% | -6.4% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +21.0% | -23.6% | +44.6% | +17.0% |
| 30D | -6.6% | -60.7% | +54.1% | -17.0% |
| 3M | -12.1% | -58.3% | +46.2% | -16.7% |
| 6M | +78.7% | -60.0% | +138.7% | +78.1% |
| YTD | +321.5% | -75.2% | +396.7% | +321.3% |
| 1Y | +2,166.8% | -19.9% | +2,186.7% | +2,572.6% |
| All | +3,165.9% | -99.2% | +3,265.0% | +2,517.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling