+117.0%
AXP vs ZM
+42.4%
+74.7%
-28.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +1.2% | -2.4% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -5.9% | +6.5% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +5.8% | -5.2% | +11.0% | +6.8% |
| 3M | -6.0% | -11.3% | +5.3% | -4.1% |
| 6M | +0.3% | -14.5% | +14.8% | +2.7% |
| YTD | -12.3% | +4.2% | -16.4% | -15.9% |
| 1Y | -11.2% | +9.3% | -20.6% | -16.4% |
| 3Y | +117.0% | +45.4% | +71.6% | +88.0% |
| All | +117.0% | +42.4% | +74.7% | +88.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling