+111.1%
AXP vs ZETA
+311.4%
-200.3%
-28.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -4.1% | +3.0% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +2.7% | -4.8% | -2.5% |
| 30D | -6.5% | +15.8% | -22.4% | -8.6% |
| 3M | +4.6% | +35.4% | -30.8% | -0.4% |
| 6M | +5.4% | +67.1% | -61.7% | -3.3% |
| YTD | -11.1% | +54.1% | -65.2% | -18.0% |
| 1Y | -0.3% | +67.8% | -68.1% | -9.7% |
| All | +111.1% | +311.4% | -200.3% | +66.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling