-10.2%
AXP vs GLDM
+2.8%
-13.0%
-23.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | +0.8% | -3.1% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +0.4% | +1.9% | -1.5% | +0.1% |
| 30D | +7.0% | -1.7% | +8.7% | +7.1% |
| 3M | -6.6% | -3.5% | -3.1% | -6.4% |
| 6M | +3.5% | -10.1% | +13.5% | +3.9% |
| YTD | -11.2% | -5.0% | -6.1% | -14.7% |
| 1Y | -10.2% | +2.8% | -12.9% | -18.8% |
| All | -10.2% | +2.8% | -13.0% | -18.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling