+90.4%
AXON vs UMAC
+494.0%
-403.6%
-60.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.2% | -3.1% | -1.1% | -4.0% |
| 7D | -14.2% | -0.9% | -13.2% | -14.1% |
| 30D | -15.4% | -7.7% | -7.7% | -15.2% |
| 3M | +0.5% | -26.4% | +26.9% | +1.5% |
| 6M | -9.5% | +61.9% | -71.4% | -13.9% |
| YTD | -9.2% | +86.5% | -95.7% | -14.5% |
| 1Y | -29.4% | +156.3% | -185.7% | -34.7% |
| All | +90.4% | +494.0% | -403.6% | +59.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling