+182.3%
AXON vs NIO
-90.7%
+273.0%
-60.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.2% | -1.6% | -2.6% | -4.0% |
| 7D | -14.2% | -13.0% | -1.1% | -12.6% |
| 30D | -15.4% | -18.3% | +2.9% | -13.2% |
| 3M | +0.5% | -33.2% | +33.7% | +5.5% |
| 6M | -9.5% | -21.5% | +12.0% | -7.5% |
| YTD | -9.2% | -25.5% | +16.3% | -7.0% |
| 1Y | -29.4% | -38.0% | +8.6% | -26.4% |
| 3Y | +139.4% | -65.5% | +204.9% | +159.8% |
| All | +182.3% | -90.7% | +273.0% | +252.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling